. |
Meanwhile, by the early seventies, a number of transit bus companies in the area, including the Detroit DSR (whose ridership numbers had dropped 25% in five years), were facing huge revenue loses and possible bankruptcy. With the state's new gas tax funds, SEMTA was able to enter into a number of short-term "purchase-of-services" agreements, where SEMTA would pay the local bus companies for maintaining service on their own routes. This arrangement managed to keep those companies in operation until many were later bought-out by SEMTA. This type of arrangement would also kept the Detroit bus system in operation through the remaining DSR years.
Purchase-of-service agreements were also used by SEMTA to launch a series of Direct Access Shuttle (DASH) routes to directly link a suburb to an automobile related employment center. Purchase-of-service agreements would also be used to relaunch suburban bus routes along Middlebelt and Twelve Mile roads that had recently been discontinued by the DSR. It was also during this period (1974) that SEMTA purchased five used 1965 GM model TDH-4519 "New-Looks" from the Evanston (Ill.) Bus Company to upgrade its Lake Shore Division fleet, and seven former Greyhound GM model PD-4106 highway (parlor) coaches that were assigned to the other divisions.
Purchase-of-service agreements were also used after SEMTA took over operation of the city of Pontiac's bus lines. After Pontiac cancelled its service contract with the Pontiac Transit Corp. (American Transit Corp.) in late 1970, that city's Department of Public Works took over the bus routes effective February 2, 1971, operating as the Pontiac Municipal Transit Service. New coaches were purchased and the four routes were combined into two. However, effective July 2, 1973, the small city-run system (including drivers) was transferred-over to SEMTA, which would use purchase-of-service agreements with Great Lakes Transit to operate the two former Pontiac routes.
. |
. |
SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY |
For "SEMTA HISTORY: REGIONAL DISSATISFACTION ENDS REGIONAL TRANSIT" See: PART-III |
Click here to return to the "SUBURBAN TRANSIT" Main Page. |
For Comments and/or Suggestions, Please contact Site Owner at: admin@detroittransithistory.info |
. |
Because SEMTA did not have a continuing source of funding at that time, this type of regional cooperation would also be used to acquire new equipment during the early months of 1971. Since the two-thirds share of federal UMTA grant money for purchasing new coaches had to be channeled through a recognized and approved public agency, a joint cooperative agreement needed to be reached in order for SEMTA to be able to place its first coach order for 154 new GMC transit buses. The local one-third share for these coaches would be covered by $1.2 million from the City of Detroit (including $158,000 from DSR funds), $818,000 from the State of Michigan, and $100,000 apiece from two area suburban bus companies: Metropolitan [Metro] Transit, Inc. and Great Lakes Transit Corp. Since the struggling Lake Shore Coach Lines had announced that it was discontinuing operations, that company was no longer included in the cooperative agreement.
With the various entities now agreeing to put up the local $2.2 million shared cost of the $6.6 million coach order, the remaining two-thirds would now be covered through a $4.4 million federal UMTA grant to SEMTA. This arrangement made it possible for 99 of the coaches to be owned by the DSR, with the remaining 55 coaches owned by SEMTA. Of the SEMTA owned buses, ten were leased (for token fees) to Metro Transit, another ten leased to Great Lakes Transit, while 35 were leased to the DSR. These new GMC built "air-conditioned" coaches (Model T8H-5307A) were all equipped with two-way radios, heated front door steps, impact-absorbing water-filled front bumpers, and the more powerful 8-cylinder Detroit Diesel 8V-71 engine. SEMTA was now becoming a major player in the Detroit regional transit arena.
|
|
After purchasing the surrounding suburban bus companies, SEMTA would experiment with several paint scheme designs during the mid-1970s. Coach #1618—a GM TDH-5303 delivered to Great Lakes Transit in 1966—is pictured sporting one of those designs while working one of the DASH (Direct Access Shuttle) park-and-ride routes launched by SEMTA in 1974. (photo courtesy of the Melvin Bernero photobucket.com collection ) |
Next came the purchase of Great Lakes Transit Corp., based out of Birmingham, which serviced Detroit's northern east and west suburbs as well as the downriver city of Wyandotte. The company's vast number of routes were based off of three trunk lines along Gratiot, West Jefferson and Woodward avenues, with various alternate, local and limited routes branching off the main lines. The company's 104 buses and three garages were purchased for $2.2 million, with SEMTA taking over operations effective April 1, 1974. Although most former Great Lakes routes were assigned route numbers prefixed with the letter "G", its Roseville Garage operation was reassigned to the Lake Shore Division, and the Wyandotte Garage operation moved to the Metropolitan Division. The remaining Great Lakes routes now formed SEMTA's new Great Lakes Division.
The last and smallest of the suburban operators to be purchased was Martin Lines, Inc., which serviced Royal Oak into Detroit and Highland Park. The company's 19 buses and two routes were purchased for $345,000, with SEMTA operation beginning March 20, 1975. SEMTA was also able to acquire the Martin Lines' five-state Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) charter license, which it would continue to utilize for its interstate chartered service operation. With the acquisition of Martin Lines, SEMTA's suburban consolidation program was now complete.
. |
CONFLICTS DEVELOPE BETWEEN SEMTA AND CITY OF DETROIT:
Of course, number one on the SEMTA priority list of bus system acquisitions was the purchase of the City of Detroit Department of Street Railways (DSR) 1,062-fleet bus operation. But even with a $5 million down payment in hand, that goal would prove to be a task easier said than done. Negotiations on the sale of the DSR to SEMTA appeared "quite productive" by late 1973, and there remained guarded optimism approaching the waning months of the Roman S. Gribbs administration. However, that optimism would soon change upon the arrival of the newly elected Coleman A. Young administration, which took office on January 1, 1974.
Negotiations soon began to sour as conflicts developed over Detroit's representation numbers on the SEMTA board, and also over what the Young administration perceived as SEMTA's lack of a guarantee to maintain adequate service for Detroiters at a "reasonable fare." Disagreements also arose over whether a vote by the citizens of Detroit would be required before a SEMTA takeover could even take place. According to a new provision included in the revised 1974 Detroit Home Rule Charter (Sec. 7-1404), the city was prohibited from selling or disposing of any city-owned property needed to furnish transportation services, unless approved by a majority of city voters. However, SEMTA officials believed they had state authorization and were not legally bound by city law.
Employee personnel issues, and the protection of the rights of DSR employees would also became major hurdles — especially regarding the question of who would pay for employee fringe benefits. But the underlying major obstacle appeared to be more centered around a continually growing distrust that was developing between the City of Detroit and its surrounding suburbs, an obstacle that would hinder regional transit develop throughout the SEMTA years.
. |
By the mid-1970s, SEMTA had adopted a standard paint scheme design of white with black trimmed windows and red and orange striping as seen in this 1978 photo of coach #26—a GM model TDH-5303 originally delivered to Metropolitan Transit in Aug. 1967. Those coaches that were not replaced by 48 new buses delivered in 1975 were repainted in this new livery. (photo courtesy of the Melvin Bernero photobucket.com collection) |
. |
Although SEMTA experimented with various paint scheme designs during the early-'70s (left photo), many coaches would still sport their pre-SEMTA colors—with the original SEMTA logo displayed along the side—for a number of years. In right photo, former Metro Transit coach #16 (a 1965 GM model TDH-5303) still sports its Metro colors four years after the sale to SEMTA. (Photos courtesy of the Stan Sycko collection (left) and the Melvin Bernero photobucket.com collection (right)) |
.. |
Preserving the History of Public Transportation in and around the City of Detroit, ...from "Steel Wheels to Rubber Tires." |